Ok, enough guys....lets discuss the data only, please...
The data is here - below. Either it means something for Tina Bar, or it doesn't. R99 used to refer to it and use it - now apparently he doesn't. Either it means something for Tina Bar, or it doesn't.
Please note! The peak Bradley refers to (flooding in the Washougal 1977) seems to be shown in this data for this USGS gage. In addition to this R99 has always said to ignore everything under 10ft in this data, for relevancy to Tina Bar ? At least that's what I thought he's been saying?
Kermit said: Jon said that he had never seen water from the river going into the containment area of the Fazio property or vice-versa. The numerical elevations mentioned are my eyeball estimates as stated in that post.
What are the numbers you mentioned relative to? Are they feet above sea level? Are they simply a reading on a gage somewhere? Where were they measured?
Answer: I think its feet above sea level?