Poll

How did the money arrive on Tena Bar

River Flooding
1 (5%)
Floated to it's resting spot via Columbia river
2 (10%)
Planted
6 (30%)
Dredge
11 (55%)
tossed in the river in a paper bag
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 17

Voting closed: August 16, 2016, 09:05:28 AM

Author Topic: Tena Bar Money Find  (Read 700735 times)

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3182
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6750 on: February 24, 2022, 11:23:31 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
If we take TKs latest diatom research paper using 377's Cooper bill at face value, he specifically excludes several theories, but one that he does not seem exclude specifically is the dredge.

My interpretation of what the diatom paper states is roughly as follows:  (feel free to correct)

- 377s bill was not a top or bottom bill in the packet/bundola, it was from somewhere in the middle.  He draws this conclusion based
on the fact that a diatom was found sandwiched between two pieces of different bills. 

- That the packet experienced water immersion at which time the bill(s) fanned out.

- While the bill(s) was fanned out, planktonic diatoms (Asterionella and others) attached themselves to the bill.  This diatom species is
active in the spring/summer time, therefore the bills only were in the water during the spring/summer time frame.

- At some point, the packet unfanned and the packet congealed back into a compressed form sealing the edges.

- Once the packet was congealed, there is no evidence of diatom's penetrating to the interior of the bill. 

- There is no evidence of sand based diatom species on the bill.  This implies that while the money was buried, no sand based
 diatom species attached (sand based diatom species are smaller than the diatom species that live in the water).

If the above is true, or at least for sake of discussion, (understanding that everything is debatable and the testing was limited in scope in
terms of it being conducted on only one Cooper bill), can we fit it into a dredge scenario ? 

- Could these three bundles still have been in the main bank bag or
does the evidence pointing to the fanning of the packet require that the packets were free from the bag or parachute wrapping?

I think it could also fit into the scenario where the money was somewhere on dry land, and
transported via one of the spring/summer flood events that have been discussed before.  At the time of this flood event, the money would have been saturated, fanned out, exposed to planktonic diatoms and then transported to rest at the area of Tena bar at which time it unfanned and perhaps buried by a few inches of sand that settled on top as the flood waters receded and congealed. 

But more questions I haven't seen an answer to:

- How long does it take for money to congeal ? 
- What conditions are required for congealing ? 
- If money fans out while under water, does it eventually sink and unfan ? 
- Or does unfanning only take place if it is out of water ?
- Can Asterionella or other diatoms live at the bottom of the Colombia River, does sun light reach the bottom ?

Sorry for the long post, just thinking out loud...

What is a sand based diatom - got an example?   

all of your other questions should go to Tom Kaye or one of the Mayors of Cooperville @ Mountain News: Bruce Smith and Marla site.   
« Last Edit: February 25, 2022, 05:35:12 AM by georger »
 

Offline JAG

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
  • Thanked: 41 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6751 on: February 25, 2022, 06:34:42 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
If we take TKs latest diatom research paper using 377's Cooper bill at face value, he specifically excludes several theories, but one that he does not seem exclude specifically is the dredge.

My interpretation of what the diatom paper states is roughly as follows:  (feel free to correct)

- 377s bill was not a top or bottom bill in the packet/bundola, it was from somewhere in the middle.  He draws this conclusion based
on the fact that a diatom was found sandwiched between two pieces of different bills. 

- That the packet experienced water immersion at which time the bill(s) fanned out.

- While the bill(s) was fanned out, planktonic diatoms (Asterionella and others) attached themselves to the bill.  This diatom species is
active in the spring/summer time, therefore the bills only were in the water during the spring/summer time frame.

- At some point, the packet unfanned and the packet congealed back into a compressed form sealing the edges.

- Once the packet was congealed, there is no evidence of diatom's penetrating to the interior of the bill. 

- There is no evidence of sand based diatom species on the bill.  This implies that while the money was buried, no sand based
 diatom species attached (sand based diatom species are smaller than the diatom species that live in the water).

If the above is true, or at least for sake of discussion, (understanding that everything is debatable and the testing was limited in scope in
terms of it being conducted on only one Cooper bill), can we fit it into a dredge scenario ? 

- Could these three bundles still have been in the main bank bag or
does the evidence pointing to the fanning of the packet require that the packets were free from the bag or parachute wrapping?

I think it could also fit into the scenario where the money was somewhere on dry land, and
transported via one of the spring/summer flood events that have been discussed before.  At the time of this flood event, the money would have been saturated, fanned out, exposed to planktonic diatoms and then transported to rest at the area of Tena bar at which time it unfanned and perhaps buried by a few inches of sand that settled on top as the flood waters receded and congealed. 

But more questions I haven't seen an answer to:

- How long does it take for money to congeal ? 
- What conditions are required for congealing ? 
- If money fans out while under water, does it eventually sink and unfan ? 
- Or does unfanning only take place if it is out of water ?
- Can Asterionella or other diatoms live at the bottom of the Colombia River, does sun light reach the bottom ?

Sorry for the long post, just thinking out loud...

What is a sand based diatom - got an example?   

all of your other questions should go to Tom Kaye or one of the Mayors of Cooperville @ Mountain News: Bruce Smith and Marla site.

Thanks Georger, I guess the sand based term was something I used to represent Tom's discussion about smaller vs larger diatoms (I suppose it's not an official term :-) ).  Where the general point was that smaller diatoms (those smaller than 3 to 5 µm) could live and move between the sand particles where as the larger diatoms would not be able to do this.  One example of the smaller diatom cited in the paper is Melosira.

If I am reading it correctly, the following quote from page 4 identifies these species as smaller diatoms:

"The diatom extraction from the surface sand at Tena Bar showed an abundance of smaller diatoms most below
5 µm in length
(Fig. 3C). Genera in order of abundance, Navicula, Cocconeis, Cymbella and Nitzschia."


BTW, for anyone that may not know the paper being discussed, here is a link to the PDF:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
 
The following users thanked this post: georger

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3182
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6752 on: February 25, 2022, 05:13:44 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
If we take TKs latest diatom research paper using 377's Cooper bill at face value, he specifically excludes several theories, but one that he does not seem exclude specifically is the dredge.

My interpretation of what the diatom paper states is roughly as follows:  (feel free to correct)

- 377s bill was not a top or bottom bill in the packet/bundola, it was from somewhere in the middle.  He draws this conclusion based
on the fact that a diatom was found sandwiched between two pieces of different bills. 

- That the packet experienced water immersion at which time the bill(s) fanned out.

- While the bill(s) was fanned out, planktonic diatoms (Asterionella and others) attached themselves to the bill.  This diatom species is
active in the spring/summer time, therefore the bills only were in the water during the spring/summer time frame.

- At some point, the packet unfanned and the packet congealed back into a compressed form sealing the edges.

- Once the packet was congealed, there is no evidence of diatom's penetrating to the interior of the bill. 

- There is no evidence of sand based diatom species on the bill.  This implies that while the money was buried, no sand based
 diatom species attached (sand based diatom species are smaller than the diatom species that live in the water).

If the above is true, or at least for sake of discussion, (understanding that everything is debatable and the testing was limited in scope in
terms of it being conducted on only one Cooper bill), can we fit it into a dredge scenario ? 

- Could these three bundles still have been in the main bank bag or
does the evidence pointing to the fanning of the packet require that the packets were free from the bag or parachute wrapping?

I think it could also fit into the scenario where the money was somewhere on dry land, and
transported via one of the spring/summer flood events that have been discussed before.  At the time of this flood event, the money would have been saturated, fanned out, exposed to planktonic diatoms and then transported to rest at the area of Tena bar at which time it unfanned and perhaps buried by a few inches of sand that settled on top as the flood waters receded and congealed. 

But more questions I haven't seen an answer to:

- How long does it take for money to congeal ? 
- What conditions are required for congealing ? 
- If money fans out while under water, does it eventually sink and unfan ? 
- Or does unfanning only take place if it is out of water ?
- Can Asterionella or other diatoms live at the bottom of the Colombia River, does sun light reach the bottom ?

Sorry for the long post, just thinking out loud...

What is a sand based diatom - got an example?   

all of your other questions should go to Tom Kaye or one of the Mayors of Cooperville @ Mountain News: Bruce Smith and Marla site.

Thanks Georger, I guess the sand based term was something I used to represent Tom's discussion about smaller vs larger diatoms (I suppose it's not an official term :-) ).  Where the general point was that smaller diatoms (those smaller than 3 to 5 µm) could live and move between the sand particles where as the larger diatoms would not be able to do this.  One example of the smaller diatom cited in the paper is Melosira.

If I am reading it correctly, the following quote from page 4 identifies these species as smaller diatoms:

"The diatom extraction from the surface sand at Tena Bar showed an abundance of smaller diatoms most below
5 µm in length
(Fig. 3C). Genera in order of abundance, Navicula, Cocconeis, Cymbella and Nitzschia."


BTW, for anyone that may not know the paper being discussed, here is a link to the PDF:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
good work -

just for reference it would have been nice had Tom pulled samples of the strata he saw in his photo below (in 2008?) to see what diatoms are in them vs. diatoms found on the Cooper bill. Would it prove anything? No. But I like random exercises because I have a curious nature.

The upper active layer in Palmer's strata represents what time period ? Palmer only said 'recent'. The cross bedded layer below the recent upper active layer represents what layer of time? Palmer never said. Ton has never said. Cross bedded layers require time to lay down, representing multiple water events spread out over time. The next consolidated layer below the cross bedded layer, Palmer identified at the clay dredging spoils layer he said was established in 1974. (Tom says thats all wrong). Are there diatoms like the Cooper bill diatoms in all of these layers? Why didnt Tom check that out?   

Food for thought - for the curious!  8)     
« Last Edit: February 25, 2022, 05:18:47 PM by georger »
 
The following users thanked this post: JAG

Offline Dfs346

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 90
  • Thanked: 29 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6753 on: March 06, 2022, 01:10:02 PM »
Soil bulb mites as trace evidence for the location of buried money
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
 

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3182
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6754 on: March 06, 2022, 01:51:40 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Soil bulb mites as trace evidence for the location of buried money
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

see-  You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
 
The following users thanked this post: Dfs346

Offline DBfan57

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 320
  • Thanked: 16 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6755 on: March 08, 2022, 05:18:55 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
What if Gryder has indeed solved this?  Why would McCoys daughter lie?  At this stage?   Gryder is correct that this case is never going to be solved forensically.  It does seem incredible they simply lost those cigarettes, even though in the 70s they had no clue about DNA.  But to shoot down McCoy being Cooper simply on the word of the FBI saying where he was is just ridiculous.  Mr Gryder has put together a very compelling argument.  The money being dropped makes sense.  Pretty much everything in this episode makes sense.

DB Fan: We can assume that there is only one DB Cooper.  Therefore given all the suspects and confessions and family alibis, someone is lying.  Or, people are confused or remember things differently.  So why is McCoy's family any more trustworthy than the other families?

My observations here revolve around the totality of evidence/information, or whatever we want to call it.  I don't know of a single suspect that is ruled out simply over one piece of evidence.  There seems to be this belief out there that McCoy was only ruled out due to the alibi, and therefore if the alibi is proven wrong, then he is DB Cooper.  Do people really think that the FBI ruled him out just because he had an alibi?  I know most of us on this forum could list a number of reasons that McCoy is not Cooper.  Even if you disprove his alibi and showed that he worked in a titanium factory, that still does not make him close to being Cooper.  I think it was 377 who said something like "ability does not mean culpability." McCoy is a very interesting guy, but clearly is not Cooper.

You cant really say he is clearly not Cooper. He is by far the best suspect.  My guess is he probably is.  But of course there is no solid forensic proof.  The FBI was not very good on this case, and if you just listen to the late Himelsback or however you spell his name, that is clear as day.  i do not know how he got that job.  I am going to wait and see if Mr Gryder keeps his promise of another video.  I do not trust the son very much.  But the girl seems to be credible. But of course its not proof.  Jut like that Barb transgender that said she did it. Now that one is really out there.  McCoy, is a former Green Beret.  Busted out of freakin Lewisburg.  He was no joke. He could be DB Cooper.  Absolutely
 

Offline JAG

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
  • Thanked: 41 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6756 on: March 08, 2022, 08:52:55 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Soil bulb mites as trace evidence for the location of buried money
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Interesting, similar strategy to TKs diatom research.

Do mites live in Tena Bar sand ?
Would mites have been visible on the bill that TK tested with his SEM?  Would you have to be specifically looking for them ?
Is it worth checking a TB bill for mites ? What are some possible implications ?  Could it be helpful ?

In TKs early analysis of the money, I believe he indicated that some of the small holes and damage on the money were indicative of bacterial colonies.  I always wondered that if the bacterial colony was identified, could that help determine where the money had been and how long it could have been where it was for the colony to do the amount of damage it had done?
« Last Edit: March 08, 2022, 08:55:50 AM by JAG »
 
The following users thanked this post: haggarknew

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3182
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6757 on: March 08, 2022, 01:38:42 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Soil bulb mites as trace evidence for the location of buried money
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Interesting, similar strategy to TKs diatom research.

Do mites live in Tena Bar sand ?
Would mites have been visible on the bill that TK tested with his SEM?  Would you have to be specifically looking for them ?
Is it worth checking a TB bill for mites ? What are some possible implications ?  Could it be helpful ?

In TKs early analysis of the money, I believe he indicated that some of the small holes and damage on the money were indicative of bacterial colonies.  I always wondered that if the bacterial colony was identified, could that help determine where the money had been and how long it could have been where it was for the colony to do the amount of damage it had done?

Tom hoped spores on the tie would lead to a regional identification - that did not happen.

No bulb mites detected/mentioned in any money report. Money Bacteria work was never completed; still pending. 

*Regarding the fact that the money itself was remarkably well preserved, Professor PALMER advised that sand is sterile, and in nature, is probably the best preservative of any soil.
« Last Edit: March 08, 2022, 01:41:41 PM by georger »
 
The following users thanked this post: Darren, JAG

Offline DBfan57

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 320
  • Thanked: 16 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6758 on: March 19, 2022, 04:49:00 AM »
If Gryder's theory about the money is true there will be nothing left of it if it escaped uncovered after 50 years.  Will never see it again.  And its never turned up.  It seems more likely than it being stored in some upstairs room of a house undiscovered.   And unspent. 
 

Offline haggarknew

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 231
  • Thanked: 42 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6759 on: March 20, 2022, 06:17:34 AM »
JAG brings up some interesting questions regarding the money. I am interested as well, regarding bacterial colonies and any pending investigation into such. Any update would be appreciated.
 

Offline JAG

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
  • Thanked: 41 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6760 on: April 07, 2022, 06:32:33 AM »
Not sure if anyone has posted these before, but here are two videos from Coopercon of Tom Kay discussing the diatom research:

Part 1:


Part 2:


 
The following users thanked this post: 18C, haggarknew, georger