We need to use these techniques to analyze the tie
polarized light microscopy (PLM),
X-Ray diffraction (XRD) and
scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
I believe a CIA-led coverup, which is being investigated by Bruce Smith, is the reason why the tie is not being analyzed correctly. There may also be connections to cow mutilations.
Yes, I believe radioactive particles exist on the tie.
Example: the "smashed" particles that Kaye suggests are due to manufacturing causes, are more likely due to the effects of reactions that happened in the Hanford site...Kaye suggests manufacturing, with no comparative pictures or even a suggested process that can produce the "smashed" particles as he suggests. (unless he's suggesting he's looked at the results of flame-spraying Ti in manufacturing?)
The EPA reports, even today, on the Hanford site are shocking.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login- Nine graphite-moderated, light-water cooled reactors were constructed near the Columbia River in the Hanford 100 Areas over a period of 20 years commencing in 1943 (Carlisle 1996). The production reactors were used to produce plutonium by irradiating metallic uranium fuel elements with neutrons during the fission reaction in the reactor core. Other defense-related radionuclides that were experimented with included:
irradiation of thorium to produce 233U, irradiation of depleted uranium to produce 240Pu, irradiation of neptunium targets to produce 238Pu, and irradiation of americium to produce medical grade 238Pu.
- Radiological hazards included external photon, beta, and neutron exposure from fission products and neutron radiation, and internal exposure to fission and activation products.3
- Seven physical testing, research, and demonstration reactors.
- Five chemical separation plants and associated fuel separation facilities, including the T and B plants, the REDOX plant, the PUREX plant, and U Plant, where radiological hazards included potential for internal and external exposure to a variety of radionuclides.
- "Three facilities for fuel fabrication, i.e., the Uranium Metal Fuels Fabrication facility, the Uranium Metal Extrusion facility, and the Fuel Cladding facility. There were also two support facilities; the Uranium Storage and Oxide Burner facility and the Reactor Fuel Manufacturing Pilot Plant."
- "Two plutonium finishing facilities, 231-Z (Plutonium Isolation Building) and 234-5Z (Plutonium 18 Finishing Plant Complex) operated at Hanford from 1945 to present. The latter is still involved in 19 plutonium stabilization efforts as a part of the Hanford cleanup program. Both of these complexes are located in the 200-W Area."6\
- Twenty-one research, development, and testing facilities where a variety of exposures to radioisotopes occurred.
- Waste handling and storage facilities, one in each of the 200-W and 200-E areas, a trench facility, a settling tank area, an evaporator facility, chemical separations exhaust filtration facilities, and three liquid waste handling buildings, all providing a potential for external and internal exposure, as well as exposures via the environmental transport pathway.
- Some 2,710 waste disposal sites and burial grounds in the 100, 200, 300, and 1100 Areas,
currently being characterized and remediated. The preponderance of these sites poses radiation exposure risks.
- High-level radioactive waste (HLW) storage in 177 large underground tanks.
High-level radioactive tank waste stabilization and removal from underground tanks, scheduled for processing and disposal over the next 30 years, pose ongoing risks of exposure to radionuclides.
- An estimated 2,750 surplus facilities, many of which are contaminated with radionuclides, are either scheduled or are now undergoing deactivation, decontamination, and decommissioning.
...
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
LoginOne of the primary tasks in the clean up of the Hanford Reservation is the retrieval of waste from single-shell and double-shell storage tanks. The waste will be used as feedstock for the vitrification plant under construction in the Hanford 200 East area. To accomplish this tank waste retrieval, the River Protection Project requires physical and chemical data on the nature of the wastes. For several years, laboratory tests have been conducted at the 222-S Laboratory on the dissolution characteristics of Hanford saltcake waste from single shell tanks (Herting 1998, 1999, 2000,2001).
.
The phase analysis of Tank BY-109' saltcake, described in this report, was conducted using polarized light microscopy (PLM), X-Ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
...
Finally, the SEM located a number of discrete particles of an aluminosilicate phase and a uranium-rich phase, as well as occasional particles of exotic composition, such as chromium-rich, calcium/strontium-rich and
bismuth/palladium-rich. These phases were too rare, or too poorly crystalline, to be identified by PLM or XRD analysis.