Another case of a 92 year old Sheridan, being more insightful than most Americans, I think.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

By the way, I just received my first email from Sheridan in awhile...it was one word, "Bullshit!"

Oh, in the follow-up email he said that he doesn't trust or like my informer (he's speaking about you Snow) too.

Unsurelock, you know that Sheridan jumped at Issaquah in the early 60s right? He was there on that night jump where the then-president of the Boeing Skydivers Club went in as a no-pull. I posted about this before.
We've never had anyone confirm he jumped at Issaquah other than Sheridan and that  newspaper article. I don't think Emrick has ever really said he knew Peterson, although EU might imply he did (EUsplaining)

Sheridan has claimed various things about whether he instructed or had a "position" at Issaquah Sky Sports.
It's a little fuzzy, in my mind.

Never been able to find someone who jumped with him at Issaquah. Sheridan is also mentioned with that same guy (forget his name) at a skydiving competition in the area.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

3) Sheridan said the dummy reserve was daisy chained.

4) There is no way that Sheridan could know this info unless he actually looked inside the dummy reserve and saw that it was

Exactly. But I just read, as I assume you did, Peterson's explanation that he was familiar with the training rig from previous training sessions.

How do we even know it was a training rig to begin with? Because people familiar with it told us it was. Peterson was familiar with a rig at that facility and described it, after concluding it was the same rig given to Cooper. I'm satisfied.

And there's nothing, no rational explanation for why the training reserve would be daisy chained in the pack, in 1971, when it was handed to DBC. No testimony.  Nothing. No memos. Not even a random guess that makes sense.

Sheridan and EU have gotten the Vortex all wrapped up into their own bellybutton-gazing.

Sheridan says random things, and no matter what he says, its used to say "See, he's DBC"

What if he said the training reserve had dog urine stains on it?

really...it's the same logical progression you're trying to make.

So silly.

Well there you go!
No one likes me. So he's right on!

It totally makes sense to dislike me. How can I fault him for that?

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Another case of a 92 year old Sheridan, being more insightful than most Americans, I think.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

By the way, I just received my first email from Sheridan in awhile...it was one word, "Bullshit!"

Oh, in the follow-up email he said that he doesn't trust or like my informer (he's speaking about you Snow) too.

The thing Sheridan will respect, is that I'm willing to go to jail due to Blevins, just so his writing can see the light of day.

Hell, that's gotta resonate with Sheridan, whether he dislikes me or not.

That's about the most ridiculous thing I've read all year--and it's late November.

Snowmman is kinda like, let see, well John McCain in hero/tough guy status.

Pathetic.

Snowmman is a total poser. Or as we say in France: poseur

"Do you know Snowmman?" Sheridan asked.

"Yes, I know him." EU said. "I know him quite well."

"He is a pubisher too," Sheridan said. "He's a good man. The only one I met. The rest were bastards."

"Don't be fooled," EU said. "He's the worst."

I actually smiled when I read this, therefore the "like."

There's no evidence Sheridan saw any rig!

Why are people saying he saw a rig?

He posted something to Amazon.

And now EUsplaining has made people think he saw some rig.

Bullshit!

There's no evidence Sheridan is Cooper. So it's easy to satisfy me.

Eric, I was about to post in your defense until I read the thing about the IP log. Is that why you just asked to send me a pdf today? Really? THAT is a dick move.

My real name is posted in this Forum. State, too. Not much to learn about me from an IP address. Want the cup size of my bitch tits, too? I really did like you much better when you were cordial.

As far as Peterson goes, you have just wasted 10 years of your life "investigating" the wrong guy. How do I know? Because like Colbert, Blevins, et al, everything you have given as "evidence" has been personal interpretations of circumstantialities. Like proving God exists.

Kenny bought a house. He's Cooper. I'm positive.
McCoy gave written instructions. He's Cooper. I'm positive.
Bob disappeared right before 305. He's Cooper. I'm positive.
Sheridan said something fishy once. He's Cooper. I'm positive.

I'll let you in on a secret. You're all wrong.

There is a phenomenon that Gestalt psychologists dubbed "the willing suspension of disbelief." It's the part of our minds that allows us to get scared during a horror film or cry when Shelby dies in Steel Magnolias.

Not...um...not that I ever watched Steel Magnolias. I mean...my wife. And her stupid friends. Chicks and their chick flicks, right? Where was I...OH -

The operative word here is "willing." See we can mathematically cancel out the two negatives in the term - suspend and dis - and arrive at a better term for what this really is. To suspend a disbelief is to engage a belief. To do so willingly is the difference between reason and insanity.

OJ had cuts on his hand, blood in his car, plane tickets to LA, a limo driver shooting his alibi full of holes, Bruno Magli shoes, bloody gloves, and a history of spousal abuse and 911 calls. That's evidence. Commenting about a daisy chain, NOT being announced "cleared" by the FBI and fibbing about an ex wife isn't shit. To believe it to be proof is...well, not a belief. It is the willing suspension of disbelief.

I chose my screenname  on this site for two reasons: to communicate that I don't cling to any particular beliefs about this case, and to remind myself to stay that way, just in case this shit is contagious. People in a vortex can't tell when they're in one.

So go throw a party. Invite speakers. Give your presentation -some of us want to hear it. Others will just be waiting to speak. But try really hard to take a step back and reevaluate your research.

And don't bother sending any PDFs. Un-fucking believable.