Hello All,
While Georger's description of what we think happened to the money on Tena Bar is accurate, his comment that Carol A. didn't have any facts on the money shards is completely false. We ALL SAW THE MONEY FRAGMENTS period, end of story. I just went back and looked at our pics and there are two small plastic boxes. One is marked '<1mm' and has dust size fragments in it. The other is marked '+1mm' and has larger fragments in it, maybe a thimble full. Besides that there is a larger sandwich size plastic bag that is labeled '2mm' and has about 10 small pieces in it. From a scientific standpoint this is how you would organize and store evidence. There is no hint that there are other unseen bags, boxes or otherwise of fragments. We have every reason to assume that Larry brought out all he had for solid evidence. He told us the only thing we couldn't see was the paperwork on the thousands of suspects because personal info was private.
I would upload a pic but it seems you are not hosting pictures on this forum and it is too much of a hassle to post it somewhere else.
Tom Kaye
Mr. Kaye says: "We ALL SAW THE MONEY FRAGMENTS period, end of story. There is no hint that there are other unseen bags, boxes or otherwise of fragments. We have every reason to assume that Larry brought out all he had for solid evidence. He told us the only thing we couldn't see was the paperwork on the thousands of suspects because personal info was private."
So, Tom is saying the large fragments seen being found and bagged in the KATU video
are not real - do not exist.
What is it Tom is saying here ?
Facts: (1) Palmer acknowledges "fragments" were found and calls them "fragments" in the Palmer report. Palmer doesn't say 'dust', 'particles', or tiny obscure pieces' .... he says
fragments. Palmer uses that word. Kaye has the same damned reports I do - can't he read! ? Why all of this foot shuffle and rope-a-dope in the Kaye science ring?
(2) In the same papers Tom and I were given by Carr lab reports are mentioned, on money specimens sent in to Washington for analysis. Dorwin Schreuder says he thinks that's where the larger fragments collected at Tena Bar went ... in for analysis. Kaye wont even acknowledge that anything Agent Schreuder says exists!
I am now going to try and cut through all of this bullshit! Here's what I think based on Kaye's past performance. I think in time Mr Kaye will come around and address the KATU video in some diminished form. He will finally acknowledge the existence of the KATU video and say several things: (a) yes the video exists, (b) the video is a mirage which only I and the science team can interpret correctly based on "the evidence" of 'something' Tom will not define or specify, because Tom can't define that!. (c) Tom will say again exactly what he says above namely "There is no hint that there are other unseen bags, boxes or otherwise of fragments", and (d) Tom will engage in denial and obscurantism for reasons nobody will ever understand.
Why? It's human nature.
Meanwhile for the rest of us, the KATU video must be put in perspective and given the proper status it deserves. The KATU video must be taken apart and discussed. That will probably be something Tom thinks is a total waste of time, because nobody here can put the excavation evidence envelopes collected in the KATU video, into Tom's personal hands. Tom will recognise only that which is placed in his personal hands. As far as Tom is concerned nothing else exists or could even exist! Tom's bias is very real and an impediment in this matter.
Poll