Poll

How did the money arrive on Tena Bar

River Flooding
1 (5%)
Floated to it's resting spot via Columbia river
2 (10%)
Planted
6 (30%)
Dredge
11 (55%)
tossed in the river in a paper bag
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 17

Voting closed: August 16, 2016, 09:05:28 AM

Author Topic: Tena Bar Money Find  (Read 1192717 times)

Offline EU

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1759
  • Thanked: 322 times
    • ERIC ULIS: From the History Channel
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6135 on: April 03, 2021, 05:12:50 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
GEORGER I'm trying to understand your point. What are you attempting to prove?

I've spent an enormous amount of time analyzing Tena Bar from afar as well as on the ground. This last trip I spent time noting the layers of earth that make-up Tena Bar, identifying trees, even got drone footage. That's called research. What's wrong with that?

What have you done? What insight can you provide regarding Tena Bar or the money find? If you have any I'd love to hear it if it's not BS. After all, I'm attempting to understand precisely what happened at Tena Bar because I believe it's the Holy Grail in this case as it pertains to what happened and where.

My pov is quite simple:  the money find is nothing but an artifact 'of the case'. The money find is not the case, and not the whole case.

But, my case facts are different from your 'case conjectures'.

That's the difference. Im not peddling a tv or movie production!  I have no vested interest other than the "facts" of the case. One glaring fact about this case is: there is a huge lack of unimpeachable facts.  The gap includes everything from aspects of the flight path, when and where Cooper bailed and landed, and a lack of forensic facts about the money due to people's lack of laboratory testing when testing could and should have been done. That's the short version of my POV.   

There is nothing glamorous about my pov.

Did it ever occur to you that the surest way to get a TV or movie deal concerning this case for those so motivated is to solve the case? Think about that for a minute.
Some men see things as they are, and ask why? I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?

RFK
 

Offline Robert99

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1711
  • Thanked: 196 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6136 on: April 03, 2021, 05:31:03 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Money sinks after being wet for fifteen minutes... not sure what the argument here is. R99, do you believe Cooper buried the money?

No.  I think the money got there by natural means and that it probably came out of the money bag at the location where it was found.  The money bag may have still been attached to Cooper's mortal remains at that point.

Regardless, it is a given that the money bag was moving downhill (from a higher energy state to a lower energy state) at that time and only a flood event would be able to cause this.  Thus, Cooper must have been a no-pull who impacted on solid ground several feet higher than the elevation of the location where the money was found.  When the flood waters reached Coopers elevation, the money bag and probably what was left of Cooper was dislodged and moved downstream and downhill vertically.  After several months on solid ground, neither Cooper nor anything attached to him would have any flotation capability and would move along the bottom of the water.

For the money to end up at Tena Bar, Cooper would have to impact upstream (to the south) and on the west side of the Northwest Lower River Road.  This road is built on top of a levee and anything on the east side of it ends up in Vacouver Lake and enters the Columbia River about 15 miles downstream (to the north) of Tena Bar.  Things on the west side of the road end up in the Columbia.  The river channel between Caterpillar Island and the east bank of the Columbia provides a boundary layer that would prevent anything in the river from washing up on Tena Bar.  Any such debris would stay in the main river channel at least until it was past Tena Bar.

Consequently, Cooper was probably a no-pull who impacted on the east bank of Caterpillar Island, or on the east shore of the river channel that separates the island from the mainland.  And he would not have entered this channel from the southern tip of Caterpillar Island.  So a simple consideration of the geography in the Tena Bar and Caterpillar Island area means that Cooper's impact point can be narrowed down to a very small area.     
 

Offline Robert99

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1711
  • Thanked: 196 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6137 on: April 03, 2021, 05:34:37 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't get all this talk of "self burial"

A lot of material was uncovered during the dig, including cans, nails and other garbage. Did someone have to physically bury everything?

Two critically important factors:

1) A significant portion of the debris on Tena Bar was left there by fisherman on the beach.

2) The buried items were all heavier than water (metal). I am unaware of any buried paper (like currency) being found.

Agents who actually worked the beach could learn a lot from you. Did you know that Portland is close to Tena Bar? Some of the Portland agents spent years fishing at Tena Bar. LE that live in a place often get to know the place they live in ? Some of my family have lived in the area since 19 and 32 after Kate and her husband went out there on a trip. You can see some of these people in the picture of chaos - attachmont.  Katy and X got married and raised four children in the Portland-Vancouver area. Because they loved skiing they got to know one of the Tell Tena daughters - the family that sold the Fazio farmers their land!

Feel free to disprove either point 1 or point 2.

I will ask Katy and her husband who dug the beach.  Feel free to disprove that! Good luck with your movie script or whatever it is.

While you're at it, why don't you ask the Fazios who also dug the beach.

Like it or not Georger, I probably know more about that beach than anyone.

Georger, how many times have you been to Tena Bar?  Z-E-R-O?

Isaac Newton wasnt on Tena Bar either! 

How could somebody who HAD a placard analysis and has been to Ten Bar have been so God damned wrong! ?  Apparently having been at Tena Bar doesn't mean anything and it may even be a curse, could even be a sign of zealous mendacity! I haven't been inside my sister's stomach, but I know my sister! 


Maybe Sir Isaac Newton didn't make it to Tena Bar, but Lewis and Clark went by it twice!
 

Offline Chaucer

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1080
  • Thanked: 243 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6138 on: April 03, 2021, 08:02:52 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

No.  I think the money got there by natural means and that it probably came out of the money bag at the location where it was found.  The money bag may have still been attached to Cooper's mortal remains at that point.
This is likely the only thing Bob and I agree on.
“Completely unhinged”
 

Offline DBfan57

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 388
  • Thanked: 22 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6139 on: April 04, 2021, 12:11:56 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

No.  I think the money got there by natural means and that it probably came out of the money bag at the location where it was found.  The money bag may have still been attached to Cooper's mortal remains at that point.
This is likely the only thing Bob and I agree on.
Ha.  Yet there are is a very large population that believes very strongly that the money was planted by Cooper.  Its not totally without merit.  But I am leaning in your direction for opinion.  Its just a crazy case.  Like Jack the Ripper, Lizzy Borden and Alcatraz, with the exception being that Cooper was not violent. 
 

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3182
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6140 on: April 04, 2021, 02:58:07 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Money sinks after being wet for fifteen minutes... not sure what the argument here is. R99, do you believe Cooper buried the money?

No.  I think the money got there by natural means and that it probably came out of the money bag at the location where it was found.  The money bag may have still been attached to Cooper's mortal remains at that point.

Regardless, it is a given that the money bag was moving downhill (from a higher energy state to a lower energy state) at that time and only a flood event would be able to cause this.  Thus, Cooper must have been a no-pull who impacted on solid ground several feet higher than the elevation of the location where the money was found.  When the flood waters reached Coopers elevation, the money bag and probably what was left of Cooper was dislodged and moved downstream and downhill vertically.  After several months on solid ground, neither Cooper nor anything attached to him would have any flotation capability and would move along the bottom of the water.

For the money to end up at Tena Bar, Cooper would have to impact upstream (to the south) and on the west side of the Northwest Lower River Road.  This road is built on top of a levee and anything on the east side of it ends up in Vacouver Lake and enters the Columbia River about 15 miles downstream (to the north) of Tena Bar.  Things on the west side of the road end up in the Columbia.  The river channel between Caterpillar Island and the east bank of the Columbia provides a boundary layer that would prevent anything in the river from washing up on Tena Bar.  Any such debris would stay in the main river channel at least until it was past Tena Bar.

Consequently, Cooper was probably a no-pull who impacted on the east bank of Caterpillar Island, or on the east shore of the river channel that separates the island from the mainland.  And he would not have entered this channel from the southern tip of Caterpillar Island.  So a simple consideration of the geography in the Tena Bar and Caterpillar Island area means that Cooper's impact point can be narrowed down to a very small area.   

In other words: a modified Tosaw scenario.

That was tested rather thoroughly for over a decade, not only by Tosaw & company, but by others, with nothing found. We dont even have an estimate of when the Cooper money came to be buried at Tina Bar, due to no laboratory testing when testing could have been done. We could not even conduct those tests today with the same accuracy. All we know is the money was exposed to Columbia regional diatoms some time, between 1972 and . . . ? The whole excavation occurred and nobody thought to keep lab samples and test them! and on and on its goes. The Court split up the evidence so the Ingram find is no longer a 'group' which can be tested and evaluated as a group! We don't know if the Ingram Find was at Tina Bar in late 1971 or as late as the Spring of 1979.     
« Last Edit: April 04, 2021, 03:29:18 PM by georger »
 

Offline Robert99

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1711
  • Thanked: 196 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6141 on: April 04, 2021, 04:42:18 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Money sinks after being wet for fifteen minutes... not sure what the argument here is. R99, do you believe Cooper buried the money?

No.  I think the money got there by natural means and that it probably came out of the money bag at the location where it was found.  The money bag may have still been attached to Cooper's mortal remains at that point.

Regardless, it is a given that the money bag was moving downhill (from a higher energy state to a lower energy state) at that time and only a flood event would be able to cause this.  Thus, Cooper must have been a no-pull who impacted on solid ground several feet higher than the elevation of the location where the money was found.  When the flood waters reached Coopers elevation, the money bag and probably what was left of Cooper was dislodged and moved downstream and downhill vertically.  After several months on solid ground, neither Cooper nor anything attached to him would have any flotation capability and would move along the bottom of the water.

For the money to end up at Tena Bar, Cooper would have to impact upstream (to the south) and on the west side of the Northwest Lower River Road.  This road is built on top of a levee and anything on the east side of it ends up in Vacouver Lake and enters the Columbia River about 15 miles downstream (to the north) of Tena Bar.  Things on the west side of the road end up in the Columbia.  The river channel between Caterpillar Island and the east bank of the Columbia provides a boundary layer that would prevent anything in the river from washing up on Tena Bar.  Any such debris would stay in the main river channel at least until it was past Tena Bar.

Consequently, Cooper was probably a no-pull who impacted on the east bank of Caterpillar Island, or on the east shore of the river channel that separates the island from the mainland.  And he would not have entered this channel from the southern tip of Caterpillar Island.  So a simple consideration of the geography in the Tena Bar and Caterpillar Island area means that Cooper's impact point can be narrowed down to a very small area.   

In other words: a modified Tosaw scenario.

That was tested rather thoroughly for over a decade, not only by Tosaw & company, but by others, with nothing found. We dont even have an estimate of when the Cooper money came to be buried at Tina Bar, due to no laboratory testing when testing could have been done. We could not even conduct those tests today with the same accuracy. All we know is the money was exposed to Columbia regional diatoms some time, between 1972 and . . . ? The whole excavation occurred and nobody thought to keep lab samples and test them! and on and on its goes. The Court split up the evidence so the Ingram find is no longer a 'group' which can be tested and evaluated as a group! We don't know if the Ingram Find was at Tina Bar in late 1971 or as late as the Spring of 1979.     

Modified Tosaw scenario? ::)  I didn't know Tosaw had a scenario.  But I understand he was interested in what was underwater just off Tena Bar.  If so, he was looking in the wrong place.
 

Offline Chaucer

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1080
  • Thanked: 243 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6142 on: April 04, 2021, 09:30:04 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Money sinks after being wet for fifteen minutes... not sure what the argument here is. R99, do you believe Cooper buried the money?

No.  I think the money got there by natural means and that it probably came out of the money bag at the location where it was found.  The money bag may have still been attached to Cooper's mortal remains at that point.

Regardless, it is a given that the money bag was moving downhill (from a higher energy state to a lower energy state) at that time and only a flood event would be able to cause this.  Thus, Cooper must have been a no-pull who impacted on solid ground several feet higher than the elevation of the location where the money was found.  When the flood waters reached Coopers elevation, the money bag and probably what was left of Cooper was dislodged and moved downstream and downhill vertically.  After several months on solid ground, neither Cooper nor anything attached to him would have any flotation capability and would move along the bottom of the water.

For the money to end up at Tena Bar, Cooper would have to impact upstream (to the south) and on the west side of the Northwest Lower River Road.  This road is built on top of a levee and anything on the east side of it ends up in Vacouver Lake and enters the Columbia River about 15 miles downstream (to the north) of Tena Bar.  Things on the west side of the road end up in the Columbia.  The river channel between Caterpillar Island and the east bank of the Columbia provides a boundary layer that would prevent anything in the river from washing up on Tena Bar.  Any such debris would stay in the main river channel at least until it was past Tena Bar.

Consequently, Cooper was probably a no-pull who impacted on the east bank of Caterpillar Island, or on the east shore of the river channel that separates the island from the mainland.  And he would not have entered this channel from the southern tip of Caterpillar Island.  So a simple consideration of the geography in the Tena Bar and Caterpillar Island area means that Cooper's impact point can be narrowed down to a very small area.   

In other words: a modified Tosaw scenario.

That was tested rather thoroughly for over a decade, not only by Tosaw & company, but by others, with nothing found. We dont even have an estimate of when the Cooper money came to be buried at Tina Bar, due to no laboratory testing when testing could have been done. We could not even conduct those tests today with the same accuracy. All we know is the money was exposed to Columbia regional diatoms some time, between 1972 and . . . ? The whole excavation occurred and nobody thought to keep lab samples and test them! and on and on its goes. The Court split up the evidence so the Ingram find is no longer a 'group' which can be tested and evaluated as a group! We don't know if the Ingram Find was at Tina Bar in late 1971 or as late as the Spring of 1979.     
In truth, the question of WHEN the money arrived isn’t nearly as important as HOW. Whether the money arrived in early summer of 1972 or 1976 or 1979 is irrelevant if we know the means by which it arrived.
“Completely unhinged”
 

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3182
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6143 on: April 04, 2021, 11:30:28 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Money sinks after being wet for fifteen minutes... not sure what the argument here is. R99, do you believe Cooper buried the money?

No.  I think the money got there by natural means and that it probably came out of the money bag at the location where it was found.  The money bag may have still been attached to Cooper's mortal remains at that point.

Regardless, it is a given that the money bag was moving downhill (from a higher energy state to a lower energy state) at that time and only a flood event would be able to cause this.  Thus, Cooper must have been a no-pull who impacted on solid ground several feet higher than the elevation of the location where the money was found.  When the flood waters reached Coopers elevation, the money bag and probably what was left of Cooper was dislodged and moved downstream and downhill vertically.  After several months on solid ground, neither Cooper nor anything attached to him would have any flotation capability and would move along the bottom of the water.

For the money to end up at Tena Bar, Cooper would have to impact upstream (to the south) and on the west side of the Northwest Lower River Road.  This road is built on top of a levee and anything on the east side of it ends up in Vacouver Lake and enters the Columbia River about 15 miles downstream (to the north) of Tena Bar.  Things on the west side of the road end up in the Columbia.  The river channel between Caterpillar Island and the east bank of the Columbia provides a boundary layer that would prevent anything in the river from washing up on Tena Bar.  Any such debris would stay in the main river channel at least until it was past Tena Bar.

Consequently, Cooper was probably a no-pull who impacted on the east bank of Caterpillar Island, or on the east shore of the river channel that separates the island from the mainland.  And he would not have entered this channel from the southern tip of Caterpillar Island.  So a simple consideration of the geography in the Tena Bar and Caterpillar Island area means that Cooper's impact point can be narrowed down to a very small area.   

In other words: a modified Tosaw scenario.

That was tested rather thoroughly for over a decade, not only by Tosaw & company, but by others, with nothing found. We dont even have an estimate of when the Cooper money came to be buried at Tina Bar, due to no laboratory testing when testing could have been done. We could not even conduct those tests today with the same accuracy. All we know is the money was exposed to Columbia regional diatoms some time, between 1972 and . . . ? The whole excavation occurred and nobody thought to keep lab samples and test them! and on and on its goes. The Court split up the evidence so the Ingram find is no longer a 'group' which can be tested and evaluated as a group! We don't know if the Ingram Find was at Tina Bar in late 1971 or as late as the Spring of 1979.     

Modified Tosaw scenario? ::)  I didn't know Tosaw had a scenario.  But I understand he was interested in what was underwater just off Tena Bar.  If so, he was looking in the wrong place.

You obviously pay no attention to other people's work, or would know something about it!   
 

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3182
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6144 on: April 04, 2021, 11:32:09 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Money sinks after being wet for fifteen minutes... not sure what the argument here is. R99, do you believe Cooper buried the money?

No.  I think the money got there by natural means and that it probably came out of the money bag at the location where it was found.  The money bag may have still been attached to Cooper's mortal remains at that point.

Regardless, it is a given that the money bag was moving downhill (from a higher energy state to a lower energy state) at that time and only a flood event would be able to cause this.  Thus, Cooper must have been a no-pull who impacted on solid ground several feet higher than the elevation of the location where the money was found.  When the flood waters reached Coopers elevation, the money bag and probably what was left of Cooper was dislodged and moved downstream and downhill vertically.  After several months on solid ground, neither Cooper nor anything attached to him would have any flotation capability and would move along the bottom of the water.

For the money to end up at Tena Bar, Cooper would have to impact upstream (to the south) and on the west side of the Northwest Lower River Road.  This road is built on top of a levee and anything on the east side of it ends up in Vacouver Lake and enters the Columbia River about 15 miles downstream (to the north) of Tena Bar.  Things on the west side of the road end up in the Columbia.  The river channel between Caterpillar Island and the east bank of the Columbia provides a boundary layer that would prevent anything in the river from washing up on Tena Bar.  Any such debris would stay in the main river channel at least until it was past Tena Bar.

Consequently, Cooper was probably a no-pull who impacted on the east bank of Caterpillar Island, or on the east shore of the river channel that separates the island from the mainland.  And he would not have entered this channel from the southern tip of Caterpillar Island.  So a simple consideration of the geography in the Tena Bar and Caterpillar Island area means that Cooper's impact point can be narrowed down to a very small area.   

In other words: a modified Tosaw scenario.

That was tested rather thoroughly for over a decade, not only by Tosaw & company, but by others, with nothing found. We dont even have an estimate of when the Cooper money came to be buried at Tina Bar, due to no laboratory testing when testing could have been done. We could not even conduct those tests today with the same accuracy. All we know is the money was exposed to Columbia regional diatoms some time, between 1972 and . . . ? The whole excavation occurred and nobody thought to keep lab samples and test them! and on and on its goes. The Court split up the evidence so the Ingram find is no longer a 'group' which can be tested and evaluated as a group! We don't know if the Ingram Find was at Tina Bar in late 1971 or as late as the Spring of 1979.     
In truth, the question of WHEN the money arrived isn’t nearly as important as HOW. Whether the money arrived in early summer of 1972 or 1976 or 1979 is irrelevant if we know the means by which it arrived.

WHEN and HOW are inextricably linked together. Like mass and gravity.
« Last Edit: April 04, 2021, 11:35:38 PM by georger »
 

Offline Chaucer

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1080
  • Thanked: 243 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6145 on: April 05, 2021, 12:58:34 AM »
No.

Let's say the money ends up on the banks of the Columbia in November 1971, spends the winter there before flood water and debris carries it to Tena Bar in June 1972.

Does it matter if that happened in 1972? Or 1976? Or 1979? No. All that matters is that it happened.

The only pertinence that WHEN has is if conditions were present to cause that to happen. But other than that, how long the money sat on Tena Bar is irrelevant in my mind.
“Completely unhinged”
 

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3182
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6146 on: April 05, 2021, 01:18:32 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
No.

Let's say the money ends up on the banks of the Columbia in November 1971, spends the winter there before flood water and debris carries it to Tena Bar in June 1972.

Does it matter if that happened in 1972? Or 1976? Or 1979? No. All that matters is that it happened.

The only pertinence that WHEN has is if conditions were present to cause that to happen. But other than that, how long the money sat on Tena Bar is irrelevant in my mind.

Try to sell that in Court!

All facts are relevant. Every instant of time is potentially unique. There is this thing called history. Time is a sequence of events in time that tell a story. The how is that sequence ....  people are often asked 'how' a thing happened. What people usually want is the sequence or chain of events that lead up to a certain point or status quo, in time .... but every step along the way matters. Things evolve.

By your scenario, why would it matter is a particle was ever anything other than what it appears to be in the here-and-now? Or a species? Or a solar system? Or a whole Universe? History would mean nothing ... and existence would be a flat plate.... held up by a Unicorn!   
« Last Edit: April 05, 2021, 02:01:50 AM by georger »
 

Offline EU

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1759
  • Thanked: 322 times
    • ERIC ULIS: From the History Channel
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6147 on: April 05, 2021, 09:17:06 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Try to sell that in Court!

All facts are relevant. Every instant of time is potentially unique. There is this thing called history. Time is a sequence of events in time that tell a story. The how is that sequence ....  people are often asked 'how' a thing happened. What people usually want is the sequence or chain of events that lead up to a certain point or status quo, in time .... but every step along the way matters. Things evolve.

By your scenario, why would it matter is a particle was ever anything other than what it appears to be in the here-and-now? Or a species? Or a solar system? Or a whole Universe? History would mean nothing ... and existence would be a flat plate.... held up by a Unicorn!

It really depends on what you're attempting to accomplish with the data.

For example, if it was somehow proved that the money was delivered by natural means, then it affords the "no-pull" option. On the other hand, if the natural means delivery method is proved impossible, well then, options become quite limited. Simply put, when it happened may be helpful but isn't necessarily relevant.

Using your particle example: How a particle became a particle is of little importance if all you're trying to determine is whether air particles flowing over an air-foiled wing will create lift. Mastering flight does not require mastering the existence of space and all its matter for time and all eternity.
Some men see things as they are, and ask why? I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?

RFK
 
The following users thanked this post: Robert99

Offline Chaucer

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1080
  • Thanked: 243 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6148 on: April 05, 2021, 11:28:22 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
No.

Let's say the money ends up on the banks of the Columbia in November 1971, spends the winter there before flood water and debris carries it to Tena Bar in June 1972.

Does it matter if that happened in 1972? Or 1976? Or 1979? No. All that matters is that it happened.

The only pertinence that WHEN has is if conditions were present to cause that to happen. But other than that, how long the money sat on Tena Bar is irrelevant in my mind.

Try to sell that in Court!

All facts are relevant. Every instant of time is potentially unique. There is this thing called history. Time is a sequence of events in time that tell a story. The how is that sequence ....  people are often asked 'how' a thing happened. What people usually want is the sequence or chain of events that lead up to a certain point or status quo, in time .... but every step along the way matters. Things evolve.

By your scenario, why would it matter is a particle was ever anything other than what it appears to be in the here-and-now? Or a species? Or a solar system? Or a whole Universe? History would mean nothing ... and existence would be a flat plate.... held up by a Unicorn!
Again, WHEN something happened is only relevant in terms of answering the question: did the conditions exist for something to occur? For example, TK's diatom research deals with WHEN, but only as it relates to HOW.

Independent of that, it really doesn't matter what year the money ended up on Tena Bar. We know it was some time between November 1971 and February 1980.

The far more important question is HOW it got there IMO.
“Completely unhinged”
 
The following users thanked this post: Robert99

Offline Robert99

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1711
  • Thanked: 196 times
Re: Tena Bar Money Find
« Reply #6149 on: April 05, 2021, 01:06:05 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Money sinks after being wet for fifteen minutes... not sure what the argument here is. R99, do you believe Cooper buried the money?

No.  I think the money got there by natural means and that it probably came out of the money bag at the location where it was found.  The money bag may have still been attached to Cooper's mortal remains at that point.

Regardless, it is a given that the money bag was moving downhill (from a higher energy state to a lower energy state) at that time and only a flood event would be able to cause this.  Thus, Cooper must have been a no-pull who impacted on solid ground several feet higher than the elevation of the location where the money was found.  When the flood waters reached Coopers elevation, the money bag and probably what was left of Cooper was dislodged and moved downstream and downhill vertically.  After several months on solid ground, neither Cooper nor anything attached to him would have any flotation capability and would move along the bottom of the water.

For the money to end up at Tena Bar, Cooper would have to impact upstream (to the south) and on the west side of the Northwest Lower River Road.  This road is built on top of a levee and anything on the east side of it ends up in Vacouver Lake and enters the Columbia River about 15 miles downstream (to the north) of Tena Bar.  Things on the west side of the road end up in the Columbia.  The river channel between Caterpillar Island and the east bank of the Columbia provides a boundary layer that would prevent anything in the river from washing up on Tena Bar.  Any such debris would stay in the main river channel at least until it was past Tena Bar.

Consequently, Cooper was probably a no-pull who impacted on the east bank of Caterpillar Island, or on the east shore of the river channel that separates the island from the mainland.  And he would not have entered this channel from the southern tip of Caterpillar Island.  So a simple consideration of the geography in the Tena Bar and Caterpillar Island area means that Cooper's impact point can be narrowed down to a very small area.   

In other words: a modified Tosaw scenario.

That was tested rather thoroughly for over a decade, not only by Tosaw & company, but by others, with nothing found. We dont even have an estimate of when the Cooper money came to be buried at Tina Bar, due to no laboratory testing when testing could have been done. We could not even conduct those tests today with the same accuracy. All we know is the money was exposed to Columbia regional diatoms some time, between 1972 and . . . ? The whole excavation occurred and nobody thought to keep lab samples and test them! and on and on its goes. The Court split up the evidence so the Ingram find is no longer a 'group' which can be tested and evaluated as a group! We don't know if the Ingram Find was at Tina Bar in late 1971 or as late as the Spring of 1979.     

Modified Tosaw scenario? ::)  I didn't know Tosaw had a scenario.  But I understand he was interested in what was underwater just off Tena Bar.  If so, he was looking in the wrong place.

You obviously pay no attention to other people's work, or would know something about it!

I have had Tosaw's book for about 10+ years and have thoroughly read it.  Also, I am familiar with other online posts about what Tosaw did at Tena Bar.  My comments are based on those sources.

Have you actually read Tosaw's book? :-\