Yup, a lot of water.
Makes one wonder what Houstonians thought 50 inches was going to look like. Begs the question as to why their preparations were so minimal. I find it astonishing that so many people who appeared on camera seemed shocked by what happened and had no "Grab and Go Bags," needing rescuers to take them back home so they could gather their meds and other necessities. Or that mementoes and memory-laden tschatkes were floating in the water and that they never had the presence of mind to put stuff in baggies or take them upstairs to a dry place.
I saw no media interviews or investigation these dynamics, nor saw people who had a robust prep plan - like turning their second story into a dry refuge filled with water barrels, propane stoves, ice chests, food and dry clothes - or medical supplies so that they could take care of their neighbors and rescuers in the neighborhood. The lack of investigative reporting during Harvey was so extreme to me that I wrote editor David Leonhardt at the NY Times and asking why none of his 20-plus reporters weren't exploring any of these issues.
My take away from Harvey and the media coverage is that America wanted a feel-good story about heroes and rescues. The height of that conceit occurred at the end of Harvey when CBS TV filmed a twenty-minute rescue of three teenagers and a young adult from a flooded parking lot in Port Arthur, Texas. The sun was shining, and the waters were no more than three-feet deep, and the film crew was standing next to the kids being rescued. Why was a chopper necessary? It was a New York National Air Guard helo, to boot, so it made great TV for the NY audience, but really - if these people really needed an evac, why didn't they just hitch a ride with the CBS van? Maybe the helo guys just said - "Hell, we just flew 1500 miles in this sucker and we're gonna rescue somebody, dammit, before we fly another 1500 miles to go home."