Of note, the original Cinebar memo states that the hunter who found the piece was from Fife. This memo states that he was from Tacoma. Fife is a suburb of Tacoma. It is likely the same guy, unless Boeing employees from Tacoma frequently find airplane parts in the woods.

Secondly, as EU pointed out, this new memo never mentions Cinebar, but only describes the location as an "isolated area".

A two year gap is in the documents. at the bottom of the first one says an agent will get back with him. it's possible they never did. we have a lot of Boeing employee's out there looking and stumbling onto things. did he move or was it really another Boeing employee?

Nether document states skirting or part of the railing.

I added the fact of wondering if it was two different parts and two different people.

I'm not accusing anyone on here and constantly get the fucking third degree. I've had enough of this and think it's time to let this go.

Your exact words were, "Flyjack found another document surrounding Cinebar."

What follows is an attempt to challenge that the 1975 document, "he goes on to describe the part being from the rear door step assembly which still doesn't sound like the skirting." And, "no mention of railing in the description."

These finds are not the same. This has nothing to do with Cinebar.

I understand the caveat at the end in the form of a question. My complaint is more about FJ who apparently can't see straight. It was not really directed at you SHUTTER, even though the opening sentence was particularly bold.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I lived there for many years, Fife is not Tacoma. It's in the area as are a lot of other cities and towns.

A 90 second Google search will bring up multiple sites that clearly identify Fife as a "suburb of Tacoma"

Also, I'm not trying to "prove anything". In fact, I pointed out that Cinebar wasn't mentioned in the memo.

I just find it peculiar that multiple Boeing employees from the Tacoma area would find 727 parts in isolated, wooded areas. Seems like a little more than coincidence, but who knows?

Either way, it's an interesting find, but disappointing that the find location is never identified.

Consider that it does not say that the Boeing employee found the item...it just says he's aware of it.

Nonetheless, I concur, this document is a very good find and worthy of acknowledgement. I too wish it specified precisely where this item was found. It could tell us an awful lot.

How the F are these things being found that come from inside of a 727 and nobody in law enforcement seems to have any idea what they're dealing with or even give a shit?

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I think it's disingenuous to suggest that this has NOTHING to do with the Cinebar find. There are certainly similarities between the two, and there isn't enough evidence to dismiss it as unrelated.

Note, if this metal item--which presumably wouldn't drift much--was actually found near Cinebar, the FBI Flight Path has some serious explaining to do considering that according to the FBI Flight Path, 305 flew no where near Cinebar. In short, it would actually help prove my case skirt or no skirt.

Again, as Shutter said, I'm not claiming this proves or disproves anything. It's an interesting find particularly considering the similarities between it and the Cinebar memo. That's it.

One thought is that the same guy came forward and the FBI never got back to him so he approached them again two year later.

Also, can anyone make out the handwritten notation at the bottom?

It also says, "NOTE: No rear door assembly lost from Norjak airliner"

In fairness, it does not say it came from inside the jet...it could be an exterior component. It also doesn't explicitly state it came from a Boeing 727. That said, it seems to imply as much in that he starts relaying 727 technical info to the agent.