But s woman would notice it, especially on a man.

When you go back and look at your investigation to date, I think you'll find many of the reported facts that your basing some of your investigative theory on are actually theoretical fact (he wore makeup, he had a wig.....)

The physical description I provided is a reported fact. No matter how much you would like to change it you simply can't throw it out and replace it with theoretical fact so it fits your suspect. If you do, your investigation is doomed to fail.]


First, there are discrepancies with the eyewitness descriptions.  Flo said his BLACK hair was straight, Tina said his DARK BROWN hair was straight, and Mr Gregory said his hair was marcelled, which is very curly.  I can’t remember who referred to it as “very shiny”, but i am taking his/her word for it. The point I’m making is that the “basic description” is really just a compilation of multiple witnesses accounts.    They don’t know the color of his hair or his suit, so both are now referred to as “dark”.

More importantly, I am NOT saying the dark brown/Black “very shiny” hair was an incorrect observation.  I am merely suggesting a reason for WHY the hair was very shiny.  It is an interesting observation for women to make, as they would never refer to dirty or brylcreamed hair as “very shiny”. 

I am saying we should CONSIDER THR POSSIBILITY of Cooper having dyed his hair and wearing brown piercing contacts as a disguise before elimination of possible blue-eyed subjects, grey-haired suspects.

Also, I agree he probably did not wear s toupee, as a cheap one would have been noticeable.  But an expensive one is a possibility.