Author Topic: Suspects And Confessions  (Read 349854 times)

Offline 377

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1545
  • Thanked: 301 times
Re: Suspects And Confessions
« Reply #4020 on: December 05, 2018, 03:44:14 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I was interested in the DBC thing only because Cossey said the rig had a modified right side pull.

Once I found out it was likely a bog-standard left side pull, the whole thing got kind of boring.

For me the never-ending NB 6 vs NB 8 and C-9 vs Navy Conical jump rig/canopy debate keeps me firmly in the grips of the Vortex. And what did Cossey really mean when he told Bruce that one of the main canopies was a Paradise model? That crucial clue died with Coss. Coincidence?

377
 

FLYJACK

  • Guest
Re: Suspects And Confessions
« Reply #4021 on: December 05, 2018, 03:48:46 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I think you are putting to much into the passengers. they had to recall Cooper and differ in descriptions.

A likeness is one thing, positive ID is another.

So, what happened after 1972...still waiting on a color photo?

Complete nonsense, did I ever claim an excellent match is positive ID.. it is one piece of the puzzle.

This place has become a clown show, Georger is an ignorant hypocrite only interested in being right not uncovering the truth. Ridicule and innuendo (lies) aren’t an argument, it shows a lack of confidence in your own opinion and reading some of your opinions, you should lack confidence. I left the Hahneman HH FBI doc out there to see if anyone could get it, Congrats to Snowmman, Georger failed, so simple.. Shutter is nice guy but his reasoning and logic skills are extremely flawed which I have no respect for. I don’t have the patience to straighten out others flawed logic and opinions. Sure, you have the right to your own opinion and to have flawed thinking. You should NEVER EVER use assumptions to reject,,, you use facts. That doesn’t mean you have to accept Hahneman, but you need to be open until you have proof. Rejecting based on assumptions is extremely flawed logic, there is no discussion from that position, NONE. It is placing the conclusion before the arg. You have entered a self imposed intellectual prison. I was stunned by some of Shutter’s recent logically flawed comments and he thinks it is because he doesn’t agree with me. CRAZY. It isn’t what you think that is important it is how you think.

Contrary to the repeated false accusations, I am not selling Hahneman as a suspect.. I am not writing a book and don’t benefit. I really don’t give a shit what anyone thinks, especially if I don’t respect their opinions.  I don’t expect or believe anyone should accept Hahneman as Cooper. I do expect respect and a competent level of critical thinking. Instead, I get insults and ridicule from positions of extreme ignorance.

I can’t find anything expressed by the FBI that they actually eliminated Hahneman. I can’t find any facts that eliminate him.. So, Hahneman is a viable suspect until I can eliminate him. In fact, other than some very short press releases, the FBI has never mentioned anything about Hahneman, he has been shrouded in secrecy, that is really odd.

Everbody assumes the FBI investigated him so he couldn’t be Cooper. Of course they did. Have any of you thought that perhaps the FBI made an error or even a coverup and that is why this thing has never been solved. Rejecting Hahneman because the FBI looked at him is outsourcing your thinking.

In a case this old, we need to review all assumptions and base conclusions on facts. The bias should be toward an open mind, not closed.

Until I am convinced that Hahneman can be eliminated by facts I will consider him a very strong suspect. The strongest.

SNOW,, Hahneman was ID’d based on personal info he gave during the hijacking, tipster info and photo ID. I have an FBI doc that describes information from a tipster, name is redacted but it seems to describe Hahneman’s brother W H. This is why I can’t accept that his death in Honduras was a 100% fact. It may be close but it isn’t 100%. I have no theory or proof other than to keep that door open a crack. A very very slight possibility that he may have faked his death, it would be a great alibi. Though my focus is on F W.

Clearly, I have far more info that you guys, far too much to reveal in any clear and concise way that can do it justice. You can reject each piece as not being proof but in totality, the circumstantial evidence is hard to ignore. At this point getting 100% proof is nearly impossible and probably out of my ability. There may be proof that eliminates him but it hasn’t been found.

I started looking at Hahneman to answer this obvious question, Why is Hahneman NOT Cooper? That is the real question. The more I looked the more he matched..

Also, I posted a note to PM for a summary of an FBI doc, I got a few responses. So, either the rest don't read my posts or give a shit about new info. Window closed. I have even posted new and interesting facts that are completely ignored. I gave some crumbs and virtually no interest. So, why bother and you think my goal is selling a suspect. Fucking insane and delusional.



I see no benefit to me to participate here, none. Closed minded, disrespectful and ignorant environment. You demand people prove a suspect was Cooper or you reject it with assumptions and ridicule. That mindset undermines the very nature of an investigation and destroys intellectual inquiry, the very purpose of this forum and very likely the same reason this case wasn't solved.


That is it, rant over, look in the mirror and figure out what the fuck you are doing here. Ego stroking or intellectual exploration.

woah - hold up cowboy! what has any of this got to do with me? Find a new scapegoat Ajax!  :rofl:

HAPPY LANDING ON PLUTO!  CALL HOME - SEND PHOTOS!   :congrats: :congrats: :congrats: :congrats:

DONT FALL OFF YOUR MULE!

Fact is, Hahneman checks some boxes. He fails to check other important boxes. Any idiot can see that!

 CALL HOME - SEND PHOTOS!


really, which boxes does he not check? any idiot can answer..

 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7088
  • Thanked: 582 times
Re: Suspects And Confessions
« Reply #4022 on: December 05, 2018, 03:49:40 PM »
Stay on topic....
 

Offline snowmman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1076
  • Thanked: 47 times
Re: Suspects And Confessions
« Reply #4023 on: December 05, 2018, 03:52:03 PM »
Flyjack is claiming the whole DBC thing is a clown show.
He's correct. I offer all posts made at any forum since 2007 as evidence.
I rest my case.
« Last Edit: December 05, 2018, 03:52:22 PM by snowmman »
 

FLYJACK

  • Guest
Re: Suspects And Confessions
« Reply #4024 on: December 05, 2018, 03:56:14 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Stay on topic....

It is,

Which box(es) does suspect Hahneman not tick?? 

Crickets, another throw away comment by Mr Innuendo..
« Last Edit: December 05, 2018, 04:02:17 PM by FLYJACK »
 

FLYJACK

  • Guest
Re: Suspects And Confessions
« Reply #4025 on: December 05, 2018, 04:10:47 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Flyjack is claiming the whole DBC thing is a clown show.
He's correct. I offer all posts made at any forum since 2007 as evidence.
I rest my case.

typo, I meant clown shoe.. it is a clown shoe, size small
 

Offline snowmman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1076
  • Thanked: 47 times
Re: Suspects And Confessions
« Reply #4026 on: December 05, 2018, 04:28:27 PM »
On Hahneman:

You can go thru all the odd things Cooper said (Minnesota/Tacoma/McChord/Yuma)

Do you have any reasons why he might have known those things?

It might explain why he picked Portland/Seattle to hijack.

Me: I'm not sure what boxes Hahneman "ticks" other than the sketch.

Walk me thru it.
 

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 834
  • Thanked: 107 times
Re: Suspects And Confessions
« Reply #4027 on: December 05, 2018, 04:35:59 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Flyjack is claiming the whole DBC thing is a clown show.
He's correct. I offer all posts made at any forum since 2007 as evidence.
I rest my case.

Snowmman posts liberally at all forums.  >:D
 

Offline 377

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1545
  • Thanked: 301 times
Re: Suspects And Confessions
« Reply #4028 on: December 05, 2018, 05:10:14 PM »
Snow was in self-imposed forum(s) exile for years. He is rumored to have been living in a mud hut in the Sierras.

Mary Jean Fryar isn't buying it though.

377
 
The following users thanked this post: Lynn

Offline Unsurelock

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
  • Thanked: 20 times
Re: Suspects And Confessions
« Reply #4029 on: December 05, 2018, 08:49:58 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
According to Vern Jones, not only did Reca not know what kind of plane he was on, he really didn't care.

Fits perfectly with the way he or whoever else made those passports. Props for consistency.
 

Offline Unsurelock

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
  • Thanked: 20 times
Re: Suspects And Confessions
« Reply #4030 on: December 05, 2018, 08:58:18 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
According to Vern Jones, not only did Reca not know what kind of plane he was on, he really didn't care.

Plus, he didn't mind being really stupid, having just walked up the aft stairs to board the plane at PDX.

SO, did a guy this dumb actually do all the things that others say he did, and that he eventually confessed to? Hard to see it being real.

But what did Jeff Osiadacz really see in the coffee shop in Cle Elum? Was it a truly a soaking wet Walter Reca? Maybe. If so, what does it mean?

What does it mean to you, Georger? Just askin'...

Reca was a USAF (reserve) Para Rescue Jumper (PJ). Dummies don't make the cut for this super competitive elite group. Something doesn't add up. Reserve PJs get no special breaks, same training, same everything. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

I have friends who served as PJs in the 129th Rescue Squadron in CA. They were all sharp as hell and super capable parachutists. No way they'd be ignorant about jump aircraft and exit possibilities.

377

The story's coming second-hand.
 

FLYJACK

  • Guest
Re: Suspects And Confessions
« Reply #4031 on: December 05, 2018, 09:06:09 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
On Hahneman:

You can go thru all the odd things Cooper said (Minnesota/Tacoma/McChord/Yuma)

Do you have any reasons why he might have known those things?

It might explain why he picked Portland/Seattle to hijack.

Me: I'm not sure what boxes Hahneman "ticks" other than the sketch.

Walk me thru it.

Not interested in discussing the info in this toxic public forum,, anyone can PM me to discuss.
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7088
  • Thanked: 582 times
Re: Suspects And Confessions
« Reply #4032 on: December 05, 2018, 09:11:55 PM »
Ok, I will remove your posting privileges....I'm sorry but I can't allow you to speak like that and still use this forum.
« Last Edit: December 05, 2018, 09:53:21 PM by Shutter »
 

Offline snowmman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1076
  • Thanked: 47 times
Re: Suspects And Confessions
« Reply #4033 on: December 05, 2018, 09:50:37 PM »
Why would someone post "I don't want to discuss Hahneman"

Is there someone else in the world that wants to discuss Hahneman, other than the people here?
 

Offline Unsurelock

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
  • Thanked: 20 times
Re: Suspects And Confessions
« Reply #4034 on: December 05, 2018, 09:58:16 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Ok, I will remove your posting privileges....I'm sorry but I can't allow to speak like that and still use this forum.

I'm actually cracking up yet again at the masterfully crafted Byron-esque line, "EU, just admit that you suck dick and are a dolt and all is forgiven," which becomes funnier when others are reprimanded for language and name calling. I was in the SUPERMARKET laughing about this, two days after the exchange, and now my chest hurts from laughing all over again.

Fly, take it easy, I like what you're doing with Hahneman. I think Shutter's half right about there being no new evidence, but half wrong to assume or be "sure" that the FBI investigated him properly. Keep us posted if you find more.