You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

So you have now come out of the closet and are claiming that the FBI flight path depicted on the yellow chart is not necessarily the actual FBI flight path?

I have no need to "come out of the closet", but I can only speak for myself here.

Do I think a set of dots, hastily connected with pencil, is the exact flight path that 305 took that night? No. Do I think it generally represents the fact that 305 stayed along the 8 mile wide V23 for the vast majority of its journey above Washington? Yes.

You would have to be a fool to think that the yellow map is some perfectly accurate assessment or to think that 305 had to flight straight down the centerline of V23. The fact that you become unhinged at the idea that the FBI flight path and V23 don't perfectly align is silly, frankly. And the fact that you spend so much energy trying to dunk on this penciled route in order to bolster your own claims is equally silly.  I mean the centerline of V23 shown on the yellow map doesn't even match V23 today. Yet, you hold the FBI yellow map to a much higher standard than you do your own route. You require it to be perfect. It's not, but it fairly accurate indicates a flight down the V23 airway. Ask my fellow South Floridian Shutter to explain a hurricane's "cone of uncertainty" to you. Maybe then you'll understand.

Stop getting your panties in a twist about every little discrepancy with the penciled-in map and just accept that the plane was somewhere along V23 that night.

Quote

And you are also claiming that Georger has posted a more accurate version of the FBI flight path?  Do you or Georger happen to have a copy of this more accurate FBI flight path or know where it came from?

I have attached the map that geoger, EU, and others have posted here in the past. It clearly shows a more professional attention to detail than the yellow map which I have said before is more like a rough draft from which you can only draw general conclusions and not use to pinpoint exact locations. I'm sure the FBI possesses other accurate maps like this one. In fact, there is documentation from the FBI stating that the Air Force provided maps with a more "precise flight path". Shutter's referenced this in the past. It's not magical, dude.

Quote

You and Georger seem to be living proof that the less you know about a subject the more qualified you are to make claims without supporting evidence.

Ah, the old "appeal to false authority" fallacy. An oldie and a goodie. My first year students often make this mistake, but they have usually cleaned it up by the time their second year begins. Shame an educated man like yourself hasn't yet.

As far as "supporting evidence", I have provided more evidence here than you have as it relates to the Cinebar find, which you have merely called a "myth", "without merit" and "nonsense". In fact, your entire theory rests on the notion of a massive FBI cover up involving redacted Seattle ATC transcript and your own "gut feeling" that the pilots wouldn't have flown a very well-known airway during "that type of situation" as if you yourself have been in skyjacking situations similar to this one. Sorry, the your "feelings" and the "deus ex machina" of a conspiracy by the FBI for reasons unknown aren't "supporting evidence". 

I'll finish by stating that the notion that evidence of a more easterly path by 305 confirms a western flight path is a myth, without merit, and nonsense.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

If it's ripped up it isn't going to float very well. it will start to spiral downward. lots of variables before any conclusions can be based. did the adhesive still exist and why wouldn't it fuse together in the violent exit? it had a tear all the way to the center.

I just find it odd that it was clearly visible in dense foliage for 8 years. I'm attacking the data...

When I was in the area we found some junk like candy bar wrappers and such. There is no way that this junk migrated much because there was virtually no breeze at all in the woods, and there was a lot of debris on the forest floor to snag such stuff.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

If it's ripped up it isn't going to float very well. it will start to spiral downward. lots of variables before any conclusions can be based. did the adhesive still exist and why wouldn't it fuse together in the violent exit? it had a tear all the way to the center.

I just find it odd that it was clearly visible in dense foliage for 8 years. I'm attacking the data...

When I was in the area we found some junk like candy bar wrappers and such. There is no way that this junk migrated much because there was virtually no breeze at all in the woods, and there was a lot of debris on the forest floor to snag such stuff.

WHO0 CAREZ!      Everything you say is irrelevant to the Cooper case - just made up bullshit and promotion to get you on TV next to Ancient Aliens, Monsters in Rivers, Who Gooed Madolyn Fipps . Take your crap to the National Inquirer and late night Ghost to Ghost. Cult crap that feeds off your endless circularity. This stuff isnt even interesting to a third grader!

Where are the adults in the room?  This is 50 levels beyond ridiculous.

PS* JT said 305 came in over the Troutdale Airport!  And now we have this degenerate FRANTIC! nonsense!

Part found near Cinebar...

The part was approx. 8" x 40" .... he worked for Boeing so why wouldn't he say it was part of a larger piece. he appears to be speaking like it's a whole part. he took the time to look it up and should of noted it was a partial piece to the railing on the stairs. how did it tear off with perfect dimensions? the photo's we see show it shredded or torn. how would he not know it was partial?