Author Topic: Flight Path And Related Issues  (Read 753613 times)

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #3135 on: August 02, 2020, 10:04:37 PM »
Is he set up for multiple calls or how many at one time without constant talk overs..
 

Offline Bruce A. Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4365
  • Thanked: 465 times
    • The Mountain News
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #3136 on: August 02, 2020, 10:06:45 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I'll just throw this out there:

I am willing to debate anyone--I mean anyone--concerning the validity of the FBI Flight Path versus the Western Flight Path on The Cooper Vortex.

I believe Darren would welcome this type of back-and-forth on his show. Moreover, it's very difficult to get much substantive across--and to counter-argue a point--in a web forum setting. On the other hand, a podcast affords both sides the opportunity to make points and counter-points in real-time and in a conversational manner.

So, again, as an advocate of the Western Flight Path, I welcome the opportunity to debate this matter on Darren's podcast (assuming he's willing to grant us the time) in a respectful and substantive manner so that others can listen and decide for themselves what sounds plausible and likely.

That sounds FANTASTIC.
 

Offline Bruce A. Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4365
  • Thanked: 465 times
    • The Mountain News
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #3137 on: August 02, 2020, 10:07:36 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Is he set up for multiple calls or how many at one time without constant talk overs..

Darren and his engineer do a decent job of minimizing those issues.
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #3138 on: August 02, 2020, 10:12:24 PM »
How many can be on at a time?
 

Offline Chaucer

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1080
  • Thanked: 243 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #3139 on: August 02, 2020, 10:51:38 PM »
I, for one, would love to hear that. Unless, that is, it becomes a shouting match with everyone talking over each other, or a passive-aggressive insult session.

But if all parties acted like respectful adults and stuck to the facts with Darren as an impartial moderator, I think it would be great.

That said, EU, you keep referring to the placard as evidence for a western flight path. It’s just the opposite. It was literally right along the central flight path - in fact is was about 2 or 3 miles west of the flight path which coincides with the wind direction and time adrift.

Finally, I’d be curious to hear your opinion on Tom Kaye’s research into the money and it indicating that it was in the water for an extended period of time, particularly as you favor the idea that Cooper landed and immediately buried it. How did it get wet?
“Completely unhinged”
 
The following users thanked this post: georger

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #3140 on: August 02, 2020, 11:36:10 PM »
I'm not worried about any insults. it becomes an issue with a certain amount of people on one line..nothing that can't be controlled..
 

Offline EU

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1759
  • Thanked: 322 times
    • ERIC ULIS: From the History Channel
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #3141 on: August 02, 2020, 11:45:08 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

That said, EU, you keep referring to the placard as evidence for a western flight path. It’s just the opposite. It was literally right along the central flight path - in fact is was about 2 or 3 miles west of the flight path which coincides with the wind direction and time adrift.


The placard was found approximately one mile WEST of the FBI Flight Path. This is a major problem for the FBI Flight Path.

Why?

Because the winds were blowing to the NORTHEAST that night at close to 30 knots when the placard separated from the jet. R99's analysis showed that the placard  would drift approximately 8 miles to the NORTHEAST before landing in the forest.

The problems this poses for the FBI Flight Path should be self-evident by now.
Some men see things as they are, and ask why? I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?

RFK
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #3142 on: August 03, 2020, 12:09:37 AM »
I believe Flyjack found a more accurate reading of winds in the area and then we have this document..
 
The following users thanked this post: georger

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3182
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #3143 on: August 03, 2020, 12:17:32 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I, for one, would love to hear that. Unless, that is, it becomes a shouting match with everyone talking over each other, or a passive-aggressive insult session.

But if all parties acted like respectful adults and stuck to the facts with Darren as an impartial moderator, I think it would be great.

That said, EU, you keep referring to the placard as evidence for a western flight path. It’s just the opposite. It was literally right along the central flight path - in fact is was about 2 or 3 miles west of the flight path which coincides with the wind direction and time adrift.

Finally, I’d be curious to hear your opinion on Tom Kaye’s research into the money and it indicating that it was in the water for an extended period of time, particularly as you favor the idea that Cooper landed and immediately buried it. How did it get wet?

Oh God I just die for more lab work - but that's me. These issues always come down to something that could be resolved (or clarified) by more and better lab work. Lab work eliminates guessing and conjecture.
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #3144 on: August 03, 2020, 12:21:30 AM »
One factor with Fly's numbers is being ground speeds...winds aloft can differ..
 

Offline Chaucer

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1080
  • Thanked: 243 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #3145 on: August 03, 2020, 12:25:26 AM »
The placard was found approximately two and a half miles EAST of the center line of V 23.
“Completely unhinged”
 

Offline georger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3182
  • Thanked: 467 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #3146 on: August 03, 2020, 12:34:57 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Robert99 and others,

What physical, contemporaneous evidence is there that indicates a western flight path? So far all I’ve heard is anecdotal evidence decades after the fact.

Also, I’m not familiar with everyone’s pet theories, but some of you seem to suggest it involves government conspiracies and cover ups. That strikes me as a convenient “deus ex machine” when the evidence trail runs out.

Chaucer, if all you have heard is "anecdotal evidence" then you must have missed the posts above, and elsewhere, by EU, Bruce Smith, and others including myself.  In fact, I think you and I have been through this at least one or more times already.

Your acceptance at face value of the so-called "FBI Map" needs to be reconsidered.  First, I believe it was FBI agent Larry Carr who posted that map on DropZone and asked if anyone knew where it came from.  There is no proof that the FBI generated that map or that it came from the USAF.

The radar facility at McChord AFB was probably a joint operation between the DOD and the FAA.  It was probably manned by military personnel, civilian employees of DOD, and civilian employees of the FAA.

There is information online somewhere, and probably in 302s as well, that describes McChord AFB military personnel giving radar data and maps to what were apparently FBI agents.  There is also information online stating that apparently the same information was sent to the NWA headquarters in Minneapolis. 

Consequently, the so-called "FBI map" could be the work of DOD personnel, FBI agents, NWA personnel, all of the above, none of the above, little green men from Mars, or maybe some lunatic in a nut house.  Who knows?  But one thing is certain.  No airliner would fly a route like that under those circumstances.

To point out a very simple and easy to see problem with the "FBI Map", at one time the airliner had a constant ground speed of approximately 180 Knots (Nautical Miles Per Hour) and the map indicates it flew 3 Nautical Miles in one minute and 6 Nautical miles in the very next minute.  Would you care to attempt an explanation as to how that could have happened?  Other such oddities exist.

Lastly, the FBI flight path doesn't pass the smell test.  It simply does not make sense.

This is flat-out bs.

We have the history of who and what the evolution of the socalled FBI Flight Path is. Which by the way you contributed damned near nothing to! Others did the heavy lifting. You have been nothing more than a spectator during this whole affair eventually generating your own socalled WEST PATH which Sluggo allowed you to post on his site!

See the attached!  :rofl:

Georger, other than your love for posting baloney to support your own theory, whatever it may be, there are other 302s and information that discuss how the data from McChord got TO NWA Minneapolis in the first place.  The 302 you posted describes information coming FROM Minneapolis.  And what was the basis for the initial jump location prediction and what was the time/date it was made?

And just exactly how did the "FBI Flight Path" evolve?  While the jump location has evolved, I don't remember seeing anything about the flight path evolving.

How is your book coming along?

Since your post covers at least 5 topics which do you want a reply to?

How is your book coming along?   ::)
 

Offline Robert99

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1711
  • Thanked: 196 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #3147 on: August 03, 2020, 12:38:16 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I believe Flyjack found a more accurate reading of winds in the area and then we have this document..

The most accurate measurement of the winds aloft was done by the NOAA (I think it was).  Tom Kaye obtained those measurements, which were made by weather balloons, and posted them on this site a number of months ago. 

Basically, the winds aloft from about 1000 feet above sea level (out of the ground influences) to 10,000 feet above sea level were from the Southwest (245 degrees true) and around 30 Knots in speed with the winds at 10,000 feet being slightly more than 30 Knots.
 

Offline EU

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1759
  • Thanked: 322 times
    • ERIC ULIS: From the History Channel
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #3148 on: August 03, 2020, 12:51:41 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
The placard was found approximately two and a half miles EAST of the center line of V 23.

The placard find in relation to the V23 centerline is meaningless. The only thing that matters is the relation of the placard find to where the FBI said the jet itself was flying. Therefore, to discover the placard to the WEST of the FBI Flight Path is very problematic considering the winds were heading toward the northeast. Simply put, the FBI's identified location of the jet cannot be accurate. It had to have been several miles WEST.
Some men see things as they are, and ask why? I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?

RFK
 

Offline Shutter

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9300
  • Thanked: 1024 times
Re: Flight Path And Related Issues
« Reply #3149 on: August 03, 2020, 01:07:24 AM »
Basically you would say the plane was 8 miles west of the placard..the problems I see with this is the amount of time on the ground with something that weighs next to nothing..pinpointing weather the plane and placard is a nightmare in itself IMO..