General Category > DB Cooper
Clues, Documents And Evidence About The Case
Shutter:
The picture shows two rows of two..Emerick has one of the first two in his hand..the second row has one tilted outward and the bottom row has only one chute running horizontal....
As for the DZ..I don't have the bandwidth coverage they do..I can bump it up a little more but ALL useless photo's don't belong will be removed if they are not related to the case..
Shutter:
Going to move all of these pages off this thread...
georger:
The Heisson store robbery the night of the hijacking and a parachute found later in the area in 1980 ... are being examined at DZ if your interested. I wont try to cover that or comment here because I dont want to appear to be dominating this forum. Happy holiday ... :chr2:
Bruce A. Smith:
The Sketches
The work that Nat Loufoque did on the sketches is invaluable. I poo-poohed it initially, but I have re-read his book more carefully and will be incorporating a lot of his work into my chapters on the profile of DB Cooper and his physical appearance.
I've exchanged a few emails with Nat concerning this development, and I thought a recent email from Nat would be worth posting here:
"Although I understand the confusion, I never meant to imply that Hunt skyjacked the plane at the behest of the Nixon administration. The reason I brought up Watergate and the burglary of Ellsberg's psychiatrist's office is because--like the Cooper heist--they took place over holiday weekends, so there's a common modus operandi. If Hunt was Cooper, Hunt was acting mostly on behalf of Hunt, not Nixon. In my book I raised the possibility that Cooper--whoever he was--might have been in cahoots with the CIA on some level, and pointed out that the CIA certainly was not happy about all the airliners being hijacked and diverted to Cuba, but the motive I ascribe to Hunt is that he was angry about the CIA not changing his annuity from a single to that of a joint, and was bitter about the way the CIA treated him in general. My theory is that this was all about Hunt finding a way to secure his retirement while sending an FU message to the CIA. And if you think about it, the CIA was in kind of a bad position here. They had to know that Cooper must have had inside knowledge about the ongoing Air America program, so if Cooper were to be apprehended there was a good chance he'd threaten to disclose information about Air America as a bargaining chip.
"Of course, Hunt would have been aware that smuggling a bomb on board a plane would have been a great way to spotlight the problems of lax airport security. I had to allow for the possibility that part of his motive was to find some way to cut down on airliners being diverted to Cuba. If Hunt viewed himself as James Bond, he regarded Fidel Castro as Ernst Blofeld, and nothing would have made Hunt happier than to cut down on the attention the Castro regime received each time another crackpot hijacked a plane to Cuba. But if anything, improving airport security was a pretext Hunt hid behind in his effort to come up with money he felt he was owed.
"I should add that I'm not a fan of conspiracy theories, other than those conspiracies that arise in order to cover up past crimes, as in the Watergate break-in.
"You're slightly off on the timing of the B sketches. They were begun on August 7th, 1972, so roughly eight months after the Cooper incident. Because of the crazy way the FBI put the B sketches together, it took about five months for them to end up with the final B sketches. One thing to keep in mind is, the first (Bing Crosby) sketch was done while Rose was in the room with the three stewardesses. But the witness interviews for the B sketches were conducted by field agents and sent to Rose via teletype machines, a much less reliable method. Honestly I don't see how anyone takes the B sketches seriously.
"Your last point about the sketches is correct, though. There was definitely dissent among the witnesses about which was the more accurate sketch. On September 26th, Mucklow was shown one of the B sketches and said the original conception was a better representation of the Unsub, and that the B sketch was not a good representation of the Unsub. She added that the artist's conception was not "him," and that his appearance was completely lost in the B sketch without the sunglasses. She also added that the hairline on the B sketch was incorrect, and that the hairline showing on the original conception was nearly identical to the suspect's. Then on October 4th another witness (presumably a passenger) was shown the same sketch. That witness told the FBI that the modified sketch no longer resembled his or her recollection of the Unsub, and that the original sketch was "much closer" to that of the Unsub.
"I find Hunt a compelling suspect in part because he had so many possible motives for the hijacking. I keep wondering if he had some reason to think he was dying. He wasn't, obviously, but did he get a medical diagnosis that he was, and for that reason was desperate to change his annuity? Who knows?"
--Nat
Bruce A. Smith:
Sketches, Bottom Line
I've learned a few things about the sketches from Nat:
1. Tina and Alice liked the Composite A best. Flo was luke-warm.
2. Flo didn't think it was nasty enough, and eventually Composite B was developed about 8 months later. Eventually, all 3 FAs approved Composite B as a good likeness.
3. Over time, Flo didn't like B either, so in the 1980s made her own composite sketch, which I find downright scary.
4. Composite A was developed in Minneapolis with Alice, Flo, And Tina all together. Several versions were developed and then shown to "other witnesses," presumably the passengers, most likely Gregory, Mitchell, House, Spreckel and Labissioniere.
5. The initial A sketch didn't have any eyes, so it was hard to get a real good sense of the "likeness." Eyes and glasses were added later.
6. Composite B began in August of 1972, but it took almost another six months of passing several versions around to the three FAs and the group of "other witness" for final approval. The initial sketching of B with Roy Rose took place remotely. All 3 FAs were home and sent in their suggestions to Rose via separate FBI teletypes.
7. Nat's analysis comes from the 2011 interview with Rose - done by somebody - and the FBI 302s that are now available.
8. I'm not seeing any special weight given to any individual, such as Bill Mitchell, or discounted by too much emotionality, such as Flo.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version